The adventures of Mommy woman
Why do some have it, some can acquire it and others just don't get it?
Published on June 12, 2004 By JillUser In Misc

I recently read a very powerful story in Parents magazine about a woman who was forced to deal with the loss of her baby who was born at 23 weeks.  The part that really stuck with me was when she talked about not being able to put herself in other's shoes prior to this experience.  That ability is called Empathy and it seems as though a lot of people just don't have it.

I was impressed that she recognized the fact that she always had good intentions toward other people in their times of need but truly didn't have the capacity to feel their pain.  Why is it so many people have to experience something terribly painful in order to empathize with others?  And why is it that some people can have the same experience but can still not project the thought that others might go through things that are equally painful?

I was always told I was an old soul and that I was wise before my years.  I credit that to a natural sense of empathy.  My older son has the same ability.  My younger son has to experience things first.  Many other relatives I have just don't posess the capacity.

I experienced two miscarriages myself and can say that I can truly feel that woman's pain.  Not to the extent that anyone actually going through such a horrific thing would experience, but it is certainly in my frame of reference.  Prior to my miscarriages I could have imiagined it but my experience gives me more credibility, I guess.

She said in her story that someone actually said to her "This must be hard for your pregnant sister-in-law".  How could anyone be so un-empathetic?!  What a horrible thing to say!  Then there are people who have good intentions but lack capacity who say "Everything happens for a reason".  If you could put yourself in her shoes, you would certainly never say such a thing.

Unempathetic people try to say the "right thing" without regard to how it will be recieved.  Experience can help you acquire empathy but it certainly doesn't guarantee it.  True compassion requires empathy.  I hear and see a lot of people who claim to be tolerant and compassionate.  Their lack of empathy usually exposes the truth.


Comments (Page 1)
2 Pages1 2 
on Jun 12, 2004
Unempathetic people try to say the "right thing" without regard to how it will be recieved. Experience can help you acquire empathy but it certainly doesn't guarantee it. True compassion requires empathy. I hear and see a lot of people who claim to be tolerant and compassionate. Their lack of empathy usually exposes the truth.


Several things I've heard and read this past week have led me to believe that there are a lot more unempathetic people out there than I used to imagine. I guess because I've always had it (or so I've been told for years by friends and relatives), I have just presumed it was *normal*, if you will.
on Jun 12, 2004
*shrug* I think it's really all to do with a person's experiences. I've been pretty empathetic as long as I can remember; whereas half my friends are about as empathetic at a dead goat. I always felt this was a result of childhood experiences and such. Whether that's right, I'll probably never know. Though I can definitely see how someone can "become" empathetic after a tragic event of massive proportions (such as a miscarriage). I really don't know though, this is all just speculation.
on Jun 12, 2004
And, in an unrelated comment, JoeUser really dislikes putting line-breaks in my messages anymore.
on Jun 12, 2004

True compassion requires empathy. I hear and see a lot of people who claim to be tolerant and compassionate. Their lack of empathy usually exposes the truth.


Very, very true.  I've seen the same thing as Teresa this week....a lot of people who claimed to be compassionate and empathetic, but who showed their true colors this week.


I try to have empathy.  Some times it comes easily, other times it's something I have to work at. 

on Jun 13, 2004
i think you may be confusing sympathy or sensitivity, with empathy. sympathy, awareness and sensitivity are a subset of empathy but empathy connotes being able to 'share' or experience another's condition as if it one were experiencing the situation oneself.

awareness doesnt require internalization in that you can be aware that someone is in pain...neither does sensitivity since you can be sensitive to that pain (not wish to excaberate it)... nor does sympathy require more than awareness in order to feell sorry the person is in pain). all three are possibly witthout necessarily being able to feel the pain as you would if you were truly empathizing .

the distinction may seem overly fine but it is very important in at least one respect. sociopaths are generally considered to be devoid of empathy. that inability to experience the feelings of others as if they were oneself is (in my opinion) a genetic flaw that is compensated for by miming or emulating sensitivity, awareness and sympathy. its also the reason why sociopaths are able to do the awful things associated with that condition.
on Jun 13, 2004
sorry for the typos. i dont usually see them til ive posted and for some reason im no longer able to edit a post in many blogs.
on Jun 13, 2004
Its also why sociopaths arent readily identifiable as such, they appear to all as "that nice, quiet fellow next door." No one knows until they start digging the bodies up out of the backyard, because sociopaths are able to fake empathy quite convincingly.

very true about the faking. not necessarily quiet tho. sociopaths are often the life of the party in my experience. i believe they are aware of their inability to experience the same things as others from an early age and begin compensating for it soon after. some are so successful, they may forget after a while they are really acting. eventually, the temptation or need to satisfy themselves at the expense of someone else prevails and they step out of the persona and suddenly you realize the friend or lover you think you know so well has broken your heart, ripped off everything you own etc. you really only knew the persona.
on Jun 13, 2004
I think it has a lot to do with understanding. For many people, they don't really understand a situation unless they have experienced something similar.

I know that I never had empathy for people with depression before I experienced it firt hand. I just didn't truly understand the nature of the thing.

This may be true for a lot of people, for others it may be simple selfishness.
on Jun 13, 2004

I think empathy is the basis for The Golden Rule, and The Golden Rule is as close as we've come to a universal law on human conduct. If you can't put yourself in the other guy's shoes and ask "how would I like it if he did that to me?, then it's difficult to do unto others as you'd have them do unto you.
on Jun 13, 2004
sometime during the past year, i read a review of a book in which the author proposed that original sin is the selfishness that prevents all humans from being perfectly empathetic
on Jun 13, 2004

think you may be confusing sympathy or sensitivity, with empathy


No, I really don't think I am.  Like LW said, you can be empathetic and choose not to be sympathetic.  You can be sensitive and realize that you should treat a matter with delicacy without truly being empathetic.


As for original sin, I don't believe in it in any way shape or form.  I don't think you can say anything at all that emcompasses "all humans" as far as psyche is concerned.

on Jun 13, 2004
Don't know why I can't edit it but I meant to write "encompasses" not with an m.
on Jun 13, 2004
You can be sensitive and realize that you should treat a matter with delicacy without truly being empathetic.

exactly my point. but this is what you orignally said Unempathetic people try to say the "right thing" without regard to how it will be recieved

im having the same problem with the editing function
on Jun 13, 2004
You are only reiterating my point.  You can be sensitive and try to say the "right thing" and not be empathetic.  How am I confusing empathy with anything else?
on Jun 13, 2004
the statement in your article is: Unempathetic people try to say the "right thing" without regard to how will be received.

without regard to how it will be received = not sensitive

that contradicts your response in which you said it was possible to be sensitive altho not empathetic (which i agree with)

like i said, sympathy and sensitivity are a subset of empathy in that either or both do not add up to empathy .
2 Pages1 2