The adventures of Mommy woman

I just caught a little bit of Good Morning America's coverage from Iowa and had to switch to Noggin (for my toddler and for my sanity).  Chris Cuomo was seated with what was obviously a cherry picked group who had very different views on  how to pick a president.  The one that really got to me was the young woman.

They went around the table and said who they were supporting.  The one man who sounded most intelligent and informed said he was undecided.  The young woman said she was supporting Obama.  Stating that she supported Obama isn't what disturbed me, it was her reasoning.  When asked about the issues near and dear to their hearts, the young woman said health care.  Fine, that's a big one that many are concerned about.  But here's the first disturbing part, she just doesn't want to pay for it!

She described herself as a young woman who isn't in college and isn't covered by her parents.  She doesn't want to get married just to be covered and she doesn't want a job  just to be covered.  She, in her own words, just doesn't want to pay for it and none of the candidates are addressing people like her.

Ah yes, her people.  The young, lazy, selfish, unthinking masses who want the "government" to take care of them because "they just don't want to".  Yikes!  But I'm sure she's far from alone on this sentiment.

Here's the kicker though.  When asked why she's picked Obama, she said it would be really cool to have a minority president and noone is talking about that either.  Maybe because it's racist and insane to pick the leader of the free world based on skin color!!

This young, air headed, confident, self involved young person embodies my biggest fears about our country.  Too many of our young people are not thinking in reality.  They are thinking in idealism.  It's all about what would be "cool" and what they want from the government.  No thought behind who will then pay.  Where will the money come from to pay for the things they don't want to work to pay for?

God help us!


Comments (Page 3)
6 Pages1 2 3 4 5  Last
on Jan 04, 2008
Charge 2000 dollars for each election and give 6000 dollars every year to every voter. Every voter can then decide whether to live off free money (6000 dollars) or whether to get a vote in where the money comes from.


maybe a good idea but change it to you get the money when you go into vote. ie when you vote you get 6000 dollars for doing so.


that way you will get more people to vote.
on Jan 04, 2008

Charge voters 200 bucks for each election

SCOTUS has stuck down poll taxes.  Regardless of the merits of the idea, it will never happen here.

on Jan 04, 2008
Doesn't "young person" equal "air headed, confident, self involved"?
If it does that I guess I was never a young person.  I remember when I felt a huge responsibility when voting for the first time.  I felt I should either learn about the issues from every side I could and where the nominees stood on the issues or I should not vote and leave the decision making up to those who had.  Maybe I was old for my age.  Maybe that's why I still don't understand the "young people" like the one I referred to here.
on Jan 04, 2008

It is a pity that dumb people are allowed to vote.  But if they weren't allowed, there'd be no Democratic party.

I mean, look who their candidates are, what a joke.

A 1-term senator who's got less experience than Dan Quayle that only has a shot because of his skin color.

The wife of a former President who's a 1-term senator who's done nothing of consequence.

And a former trial-lawyer, ambulance chaser who has no concept of how the real world works because the totality of his experience in economics comes from scamming courts to confiscate money from the people who actually do real work.

While I am no fan of all the Republican candidates, the contrast in principles, experience, and competence is pretty stark.  When was the last time the Democrats put someone decent up? You know, someone's whose real world experience wasn't being a freaking lawyer. 

on Jan 04, 2008
i am sorry but i think the most important thing is to get people to understand. that voting is the most important thing a citizen can do for their country.
on Jan 04, 2008
understanding what they are voting about is close behind that.
on Jan 04, 2008
While I am no fan of all the Republican candidates, the contrast in principles, experience, and competence is pretty stark. When was the last time the Democrats put someone decent up? You know, someone's whose real world experience wasn't being a freaking lawyer.


Oddly enough, the DNC's best qualified candidate is probably Bill Richardson. He barely made a blip on the radar screen.

I'm starting to think he's really running for Veep, though.
on Jan 04, 2008
I'm starting to think he's really running for Veep, though.


I really hope he is chosen as the Veep candidate. He'd be a great running mate, far as I'm concerned.
on Jan 04, 2008
understanding what they are voting about is close behind that.
You couldn't be more wrong!  Being and uninformed voter is doing your country a disservice.  Why on earth would it be a good thing to vote without understanding what you're voting about?!
on Jan 04, 2008
You couldn't be more wrong! Being and uninformed voter is doing your country a disservice.


no first you have to get people use to the idea of voting. fewer than 50% of the voting population votes during a presidential election. and only about 25% vote otherwise. you have to get people use to the idea of voting.


some of these non voters will never vote because they are lazy. but most i think do not vote because they feel that they are uninformed and people like you keep telling them not to vote unless they get informed. we now have the web, how many people like you are trying to get non bias information about candidates and programs to these people.

so people like you need to either to stop telling people they can't vote because they are to stupid or help to educate them.

if i knew what to do i would do it. and if i had the money to run a real website to do that.
on Jan 04, 2008
no first you have to get people use to the idea of voting. fewer than 50% of the voting population votes during a presidential election. and only about 25% vote otherwise. you have to get people use to the idea of voting.


I'd rather have the illiterate masses NOT vote, danny boy. The more we let the idiots vote, the more stupid this country becomes - until it becomes a popularity pissing match, not unlike what we see these days with "Obama girl" and "Giuliani girl" having more sway over dumbass voters than actual stances and beliefs.
on Jan 04, 2008
The more we let the idiots vote,


and the fewer that vote the more in empowered the politicians are.
on Jan 04, 2008
If you aren't a liberal by the age of 24, you don't have a heart. If you aren't a conservative by age 40, you don't have a brain."


I'm not quite sure but I thought I read that phrase in Bernard Goldberg's Crazies to the left of me book. The few pages I read anyways.
on Jan 04, 2008
OK, according to this page Link it was Churchill who said it LW.
on Jan 04, 2008
OK, according to this page Link it was Churchill who said it LW


Yeah, but that was some random poster on some random site (who was ill-informed). If you read Gene's reply in #29, the Churchill Centre (people who are paid to know these things) disagrees. So for what it's worth . . .
6 Pages1 2 3 4 5  Last