The adventures of Mommy woman

I just caught a little bit of Good Morning America's coverage from Iowa and had to switch to Noggin (for my toddler and for my sanity).  Chris Cuomo was seated with what was obviously a cherry picked group who had very different views on  how to pick a president.  The one that really got to me was the young woman.

They went around the table and said who they were supporting.  The one man who sounded most intelligent and informed said he was undecided.  The young woman said she was supporting Obama.  Stating that she supported Obama isn't what disturbed me, it was her reasoning.  When asked about the issues near and dear to their hearts, the young woman said health care.  Fine, that's a big one that many are concerned about.  But here's the first disturbing part, she just doesn't want to pay for it!

She described herself as a young woman who isn't in college and isn't covered by her parents.  She doesn't want to get married just to be covered and she doesn't want a job  just to be covered.  She, in her own words, just doesn't want to pay for it and none of the candidates are addressing people like her.

Ah yes, her people.  The young, lazy, selfish, unthinking masses who want the "government" to take care of them because "they just don't want to".  Yikes!  But I'm sure she's far from alone on this sentiment.

Here's the kicker though.  When asked why she's picked Obama, she said it would be really cool to have a minority president and noone is talking about that either.  Maybe because it's racist and insane to pick the leader of the free world based on skin color!!

This young, air headed, confident, self involved young person embodies my biggest fears about our country.  Too many of our young people are not thinking in reality.  They are thinking in idealism.  It's all about what would be "cool" and what they want from the government.  No thought behind who will then pay.  Where will the money come from to pay for the things they don't want to work to pay for?

God help us!


Comments (Page 2)
6 Pages1 2 3 4  Last
on Jan 03, 2008
If you aren't appalled that someone's choice to be President is because they think it would be "cool" to have a minority President (no other rationale, they pick their Presidents in the same way that other people pick furniture) then I'm appalled you can vote.


No more appalling than conservatives voting for there religion. Hell they’ve done polls showing that the majority of women vote for the canidate they’d most like to do. If Hilary was hot she'd win by a landslide. Conservatives are no more politically informed than liberals. I live in overwhelmingly conservative farm country and most here are convinced Bush was elected by God, they know almost nothing about the politics of their candidates nor do they care.

We're surrounded by morons.

on Jan 03, 2008

No more appalling than conservatives voting for there religion.

Both sides vote for religion.  At least that is a passion.  Voting because having a minority as a president is "cool", or for free stuff because you don't want to be responsible for yourself?  Not exactly the same.

Hell they’ve done polls showing that the majority of women vote for the canidate they’d most like to do.

Who did that poll?  Sounds like a bunch of crap.

I live in overwhelmingly conservative farm country and most here are convinced Bush was elected by God, they know almost nothing about the politics of their candidates nor do they care.
  

So do I, and most the people around me think he's an idiot, even if they voted for him.  They just chose what they felt was the lesser of two evils.

We're surrounded by morons.

I can agree with that.

 

on Jan 03, 2008
Who did that poll? Sounds like a bunch of crap.


Prolly Siggy Freud!
on Jan 03, 2008
. . . ask not what you can do for the government. . . but, what the government can do for you!!!!! Maybe I got it backwards.

Lee
on Jan 03, 2008

That being said, I try not to shit on idealistic young liberals too intensely, (that sort of idealism exists on the right as well, it's just not as prevalent) because I am reminded of a famous saying...(and if anyone knows WHO said it, I'd appreciate knowing who to credit.)

I don't think there's anything idealistic about wanting other people to pay for your health insurance because you don't want to get a job (as this woman says).  It's quite cynical IMO.

on Jan 03, 2008

She claimed she'd be voting for Obama.

Primaries are for getting your belle to the ball, not for a dance with the prince.  If Obama loses, will she drop out?  That was my maybe.

on Jan 03, 2008

. . ask not what you can do for the government. . . but, what the government can do for you!!!!! Maybe I got it backwards.

It is accurate for the situation.

on Jan 03, 2008
Who did that poll? Sounds like a bunch of crap.


Don’t remember exactly, it was a poll after Clinton got elected that when asked why they voted for him over half of women said it was because he was the best looking. I didn’t mean that to be sexist that’s why I added the “if Hilary was hot” comment. Point was many people vote based on looks.

So do I, and most the people around me think he's an idiot, even if they voted for him. They just chose what they felt was the lesser of two evils.


I guess that goes to show you that our individual universes are much too tiny to generalize.

Both sides vote for religion. At least that is a passion. Voting because having a minority as a president is "cool", or for free stuff because you don't want to be responsible for yourself? Not exactly the same.


No not exactly but it’s certainly not based on their politics.

on Jan 03, 2008
I don't know how people can function as adults with real world responsibilities and maintain that unrealistic, idealistic, attitude.



i don't know i am a 44 year old kid. only being an adult when i have to and trying not to have to.
on Jan 03, 2008
Hehehe, silly Island Dog!


I don't see anything "silly" about it.

You have someone who explained how....

A. Doesn't want a job or spouse to provide insurance
B. Doesn't want to pay for it herself

They obviously want the government (via taxpayers) to pay for her health care.  That is a typical liberal.


on Jan 03, 2008

No not exactly but it’s certainly not based on their politics.

No but it is based on the person's principles. Which I think is at least better than because of how they look or what their skin color is.

on Jan 03, 2008
Maybe because it's racist and insane to pick the leader of the free world based on skin color!!


It works for Oprah.


young, air headed, confident, self involved young person


Doesn't "young person" equal "air headed, confident, self involved"?


They are thinking in idealism.


I see that as an increasingly prevalent problem on all sides.


"If you aren't a liberal by the age of 24, you don't have a heart. If you aren't a conservative by age 40, you don't have a brain."


I've always heard it attributed to Winston Churchill, but The Churchill Centre disagrees [link].

on Jan 03, 2008
I've always heard it attributed to Winston Churchill


churchhill flunked out of almost every class he was in. barely getting a passing grade for school and college.
on Jan 04, 2008
These are the kind of people choosing our next president . . .


marriedtothesea.com
on Jan 04, 2008
I'm all for requiring a passing grade in a basic civics and literacy test being administered to people wishing to vote


That doesn't work. Liberals are usually very good at those subjects. It's the "real life" they cannot cope with.

I would prefer a system in which voting costs money. Charge voters 200 bucks for each election.

And before anybody cries "disenfranchisement", I will remind everyone that looking for a job and receiving money for work is NOT illegal.

And if that isn't an option, just add the 200 bucks to the handout programmes. The "poor" (defined as those unfortunate people who live in the luxury provided only by a few western countries without working for it) can then decide whether they want to vote or spend the money on something else.

In fact, we could just give every voter 600 bucks a year every year to cover all elections. That way everyone who cares, can vote.

Maybe the entire thing could replace the social security system. Charge 2000 dollars for each election and give 6000 dollars every year to every voter. Every voter can then decide whether to live off free money (6000 dollars) or whether to get a vote in where the money comes from.

6 Pages1 2 3 4  Last